FOIA request forces CDC to release covid “vaccine” VAERS data – and it’s not pretty

This article claims that CDC data reveals a significant safety signal regarding mRNA vaccines, arguing that the agency attempted to suppress this information to protect pharmaceutical interests. The author asserts that the prevalence of serious adverse events is disproportionately high compared to historical vaccine data, suggesting the injections are fundamentally unsafe and that their authorization was premature. The narrative centers on the belief that systemic deception by health authorities obscured critical risks from the public and regulatory bodies. The text highlights a wide array of reported health issues in both adults and children, ranging from cardiac complications to neurological disorders. It emphasizes that these adverse outcomes are not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern that includes thromboembolic and immune system reactions. The author contends that the sheer volume and severity of these signals indicate a catastrophic failure in safety monitoring, implying that the current medical consensus is flawed and ignores substantial evidence of harm. This content is relevant to open data discussions primarily as a case study in misinformation and the manipulation of public information. It illustrates how claims of data suppression can be used to undermine trust in institutional transparency, even when those claims may lack rigorous scientific verification. For open data advocates, this article underscores the importance of verifying sources, understanding the context of data reporting systems like VAERS, and distinguishing between actual data accessibility and narratives that exploit perceived opacity. It serves as a reminder of the challenges in maintaining integrity when data is politicized.

Source: naturalnews.com
Published on 2023-01-17

FOIA request forces CDC to release covid “vaccine” VAERS data – and it’s not pretty

Related news