Horowitz: They knew: FOIA document shows government anticipated mass vaccine injuries, then observed them from day one

The article claims that government officials anticipated widespread vaccine injuries prior to the rollout of mRNA shots, based on Freedom of Information Act documents. It argues that the CDC contracted with defense contractors to handle an influx of adverse event reports from the outset, suggesting a predetermined expectation of mass harm rather than an unexpected public health crisis. This narrative posits that authorities prioritized the vaccination campaign despite forewarning, raising serious ethical concerns about transparency and public safety. The piece asserts that this internal knowledge contradicts the official narrative which often dismissed the volume of vaccine injury reports as fraudulent or anomalous. By highlighting the discrepancy between public statements and internal preparations, the author suggests a deliberate effort to obscure the true scale of adverse reactions. This lack of disclosure is portrayed as a significant failure of governance, implying that citizens were kept in the dark about potential risks that officials fully understood beforehand. This discussion is relevant to open data because it hinges on the release and interpretation of previously restricted government records. The argument illustrates how transparency initiatives can challenge established narratives by exposing the gap between public assurances and internal operational planning. However, it also demonstrates the polarized interpretation of such data, where freedom of information requests are used to support specific political conclusions rather than objective scientific inquiry, highlighting the complex role of data in public discourse.

Source: freerepublic.com
Published on 2023-03-24

Hate crimes in Saskatchewan have increased since pandemic, Statistics Canada reports | Globalnews.ca »

Open Data

Related news