The article highlights a significant decline in transparency, as the INAI reported increased refusals by the Federal Government to provide public information. This trend underscores a systemic barrier to open data, where access to essential records is obstructed rather than facilitated. For the open data community, this signifies a critical challenge in securing the fundamental right of citizens to scrutinize governmental actions, revealing a gap between legal frameworks and actual administrative practices. Beyond bureaucratic hurdles, the text critiques a broader societal shift toward dehumanization and the consumption of suffering as entertainment. The author argues that this cultural cynicism erodes the ethical foundation necessary for a functioning democracy. By framing life as a spectacle, society abandons the collective responsibility required for mutual improvement, thereby weakening the social cohesion that supports transparent and accountable institutions. True progress requires a return to humanism, defined not merely as an academic pursuit but as a practical necessity for all professionals, from doctors to policymakers. The relevance to open data lies in this ethical imperative: data transparency is not just a technical requirement but a tool for fostering a society that values individual dignity and collective harmony. Without a humanistic approach, open data initiatives risk being ignored or misused, failing to bridge the gap between information availability and genuine public empowerment.
Source: alcalorpolitico.comPublished on 2023-03-30