Con el INAI tampoco, Presidente (y adláteres), es para los mexicanos, no para los poderes del Estado
The article asserts that the Mexican President is deliberately misinformed or lying regarding the National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information, and Personal Data Protection (INAI). It refutes the claim that the institution was complicit in past corruption, arguing instead that the INAI played a key role in exposing the very scandals that mobilized public opinion and enabled the current administration to win power. The text emphasizes that the institute is a cornerstone of Mexican democracy, created through long-standing opposition efforts to ensure accountability in a previously closed and corrupt regime. The central argument is that the current obstruction of the INAI’s operations, including the refusal to appoint commissioners, constitutes an attack on democratic transparency rather than a fight against corruption. The author contends that those who hinder transparency are effectively aspiring dictators who wish to hide potential illicit activities. By paralyzing the institute, the government is undermining the constitutional right of citizens to access public information, prioritizing political secrecy over the public interest and the principles of liberal democracy. This situation is critically relevant to open data because it highlights the political vulnerability of the infrastructure that makes data public. The INAI and the National Transparency Platform are essential mechanisms that ensure government data is accessible, neutral, and usable by society, not just by state actors. When political powers attempt to neutralize these institutions, they directly threaten the availability and integrity of open data, proving that legal frameworks alone are insufficient without robust political commitment to transparency.
Source: vanguardia.com.mxPublished on 2023-04-17