Presenta INAI reclamación contra suspensión de Corte
The article highlights a critical confrontation between Mexico’s transparency authority and political power, centering on the Supreme Court’s suspension of the institute’s plenary session. The main conclusion is that this legal maneuver, which prevents the body from meeting with fewer than six members, effectively paralyzes its ability to resolve hundreds of pending cases. This institutional blockage represents a direct threat to democratic safeguards, as it undermines the mechanism designed to ensure government accountability and public oversight. Relevance to open data lies in the alleged coordinated effort to ignore transparency requests. Authorities report directives from high-level government offices instructing mandatory subjects to stop responding to information inquiries. This deliberate non-compliance creates a systemic opacity, demonstrating how political interests can exploit procedural gaps to withhold public records. The surge in legal appeals reflects a breakdown in the standard administrative process, where the right to access data is being actively obstructed rather than facilitated through proper channels. Ultimately, the institute warns that this erosion of transparency privileges leads to governmental arbitrariness and impunity. By framing attacks on the transparency body as attacks on democracy itself, the article underscores that open data is not merely a technical issue but a fundamental pillar of citizen rights. The narrative serves as an urgent call to defend independent oversight institutions, emphasizing that without robust mechanisms to enforce data disclosure, the public remains exposed to corruption and unaccountable decision-making.
Source: elpuntocritico.comPublished on 2023-05-05