Los tribunales ya han rebajado 1.079 condenas a agresores sexuales desde que entró en vigor la ley del 'solo sí es sí'

The recent release of judicial data reveals that more than 1,000 convictions for sexual assault have been reviewed and reduced under the “only yes means yes” law, resulting in the release of more than 100 offenders. This phenomenon, driven primarily by provincial appellate courts, indicates a divergent application of the legislation across different courts, fostering a perception of impunity and social tension. The discretion involved in interpreting sexual freedom has led to a significant proportion of final judgments being modified, altering the initial impact intended by the legal reform. To address this jurisprudential fragmentation, the Supreme Court has convened a special plenary session aimed at unifying criteria and establishing clear doctrine regarding these reviews. This initiative seeks to resolve contradictions among decisions made by different judicial instances, ensuring a uniform application of the law. The intervention of the highest judicial body is crucial to restoring legal certainty to the criminal justice system and mitigating the variability in outcomes that have emerged since the law came into effect. This case is fundamental for open data because it highlights the critical importance of transparency in the administration of justice. Data from the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) demonstrate how the publication of detailed information enables the identification of systemic trends and legislative flaws, facilitating public scrutiny and political debate. Without access to accurate and disaggregated data, citizens and lawmakers would lack the evidence needed to understand the real-world consequences of laws, underscoring the role of open data as an essential tool for accountability and the continuous improvement of public policies.

Source: 20minutos.es
Published on 2023-05-12