El secuestro atenta contra los más pobres
Official reports claiming a drastic reduction in kidnappings are methodologically flawed and substantially false. This misinformation obscures a reality in which data is manipulated to artificially lower statistics, specifically by reclassifying kidnapping cases under the broader category of offenses against personal freedom. This lack of transparency prevents an accurate assessment of the security crisis. The relevance of this article to open data lies in exposing how the misuse of public statistics undermines accountability. When governments obscure the truth through opaque classification criteria, it becomes impossible for civil society to analyze trends or demand effective solutions. The discrepancy between high-profile rescue cases and official reports highlights a systemic failure in data integrity, demonstrating that without transparent, honest, and verifiable information, democratic oversight is compromised. Consequently, the government’s perception of success is built on unreliable data, preventing any genuine strategy to combat illegal deprivation of liberty. Civil society organizations must continue to challenge these distorted narratives. Only by insisting on truthful data recording and public disclosure can authorities be held accountable and victims receive the support they require within a transparent democratic framework.
Source: vanguardia.com.mxPublished on 2023-06-22