Biden regime knew in January of 2021 that jabs didn’t stop covid, emails show – NaturalNews.com
This article argues that US health officials, including CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and former NIH Director Francis Collins, possessed internal evidence shortly after the vaccine rollout that "breakthrough cases" indicated the vaccines were ineffective at preventing transmission or illness. The narrative asserts that these officials acknowledged these limitations in private communications while publicly maintaining false claims about vaccine efficacy, thereby engaging in deliberate deception and potential perjury against the American public. Furthermore, the text contends that the government responded to emerging doubts not through scientific inquiry but through aggressive censorship and the silencing of critics. It suggests that Big Tech, acting on federal direction, suppressed dissenting voices regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness. This coordinated effort is portrayed as an attempt to hide the truth about the vaccines' limitations and protect officials from accountability for their initial public statements. The relevance to open data lies in the demonstration of how transparency mechanisms, such as FOIA requests, can expose discrepancies between internal government records and public narratives. By revealing these documents, open data initiatives allow citizens to verify official claims against internal evidence. This case serves as a critical example of how access to unredacted governmental communications is essential for holding public health authorities accountable and understanding the reality of policy decisions made during crises.
Source: naturalnews.comPublished on 2023-06-24
Related news
- The freedom of information request that revealed a NSW Police cover-up
- Gobierno C-LM celebra el crecimiento "importante" en las pernoctaciones internacionales en la región en mayo
- Why does the government keep obstructing UFO transparency efforts?
- Polar Bear Defense in Canada, August 17, 1993 FOIA Incident 47