The text argues that Mexican democracy is at risk due to candidate selection processes perceived as unfair and manipulated. It criticizes the withdrawal of citizen leaders who believe the system rewards mass manipulation over merit, potentially placing incompetent or complicit figures in power. This undermines trust in institutions and perpetuates a cycle of political disillusionment among the population. Additionally, the text offers an anthropological reflection on human nature, highlighting human unpredictability and the capacity of individuals to act with both kindness and malice. It warns that, despite advanced technological evolution, the selection of leaders remains a vulnerable point. The historical accumulation of power has favored despotic leaders who generate inequality, hindering true social and cultural evolution. This underscores the urgent need to reform systems to prevent the fate of millions from depending on the will of a few. This article is relevant to open data because transparency in electoral processes and accessibility to information about candidate selection methodologies are essential for verifying democratic legitimacy. By questioning whether the mechanisms are “rigged,” the text emphasizes the importance of having open, auditable data that enable citizens to monitor the fairness of political rules, ensuring that decisions are not biased by hidden interests or a lack of accountability.
Source: zocalo.com.mxPublished on 2023-07-04
Related news
- En tres días, se inscribieron 3.500 personas para ser autoridades de mesa en Santa Fe
- El fotógrafo que lucha con Wikipedia por la imagen de un mono: “Me deben 52 millones de dólares”
- Demandan a OpenAI por 'robar' datos para entrenar a ChatGPT
- Castilla-La Mancha alcanza las 127.731 pernoctaciones extrahoteleras en mayo y 55.935 viajeros
- Consulte todos los datos internos de la encuesta de EL PAÍS publicada este 3 de julio