¿Inteligencia Artificial frente a la barrera de la creación humana? | El Deber

The use of artificial intelligence to complete musical works, as in the recent case involving the Beatles, has reignited the debate over the boundaries of technological creativity versus copyright. Although there is uncertainty about how to regulate these new forms of production, legal analysis suggests that the risk does not lie in the ownership of rights, but rather in the protection of the artist’s image and voice. It is argued that, as long as technology functions as a supportive tool under human supervision, original creation retains its protected status and inherent value. Existing national and international regulations already establish a robust framework for protecting intellectual creations, including software programs and databases. The current challenge is not a lack of laws, but rather the effective enforcement of these norms and the cultivation of a culture that respects copyright payments among users. Education about the value of authorship is crucial to ensure that creators receive fair compensation for their works, avoiding the mistaken belief that physical ownership of a medium confers rights over the work itself. This article is relevant to the open data community because it illustrates the tension between technological availability and the protection of intellectual property. AI relies on large volumes of data to learn and generate content, raising ethical questions about the legality of using copyrighted works in the training of models. To move toward open data standards that are respectful, it is necessary to clarify how to balance technological innovation with the recognition of human authorship and adherence to existing copyright regulations.

Source: eldeber.com.bo
Published on 2023-07-06