Junaeb refutes allegations of concealing evidence by clarifying that the shared document was internal working material and was never published on the Transparency Portal. The agency emphasizes that the file was routinely accessible to all contracting providers to facilitate their operational relationship, rather than serving as a hidden record of misconduct. The response highlights the critical need for clear distinctions between internal administrative tools and public accountability records. By maintaining that the document was never public, Junaeb underscores the importance of accurately defining what constitutes open data versus private operational files. This case is relevant to open data because it illustrates common disputes over information accessibility and transparency. It demonstrates how organizations must clearly communicate the status and intended audience of digital documents to prevent misunderstandings regarding public access rights and institutional transparency.
Source: puranoticia.pnt.clPublished on 2023-07-12