The article reveals a critical gap between the official statistics of the Public Prosecutor’s Office and the actual criminal reality, as evidenced by open data on thefts and robberies. Although the recorded figures are high, a criminologist points out that these data represent only a small fraction of the actual crime, since most victims do not report incidents due to distrust in institutions or fear. This underrepresentation means that perceptions based solely on public databases are incomplete and potentially misleading, obscuring the true scale of insecurity. The relevance to open data lies in the need to contextualize and supplement official statistics with victimization studies that capture unreported crime. Without integrating empirical and social data, the available metrics distort the understanding of the problem, ignoring factors such as revictimization and judicial inefficiency that deter citizens from seeking justice. True transparency requires acknowledging that administrative data represent only part of the picture. Finally, it is argued that the current focus on penal repression is counterproductive, as strengthening prisons only expands the power of criminal gangs. The proposed solution involves a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes prevention, social integration, and addiction treatment. To improve public management, open data should serve as a tool to validate these sociological perspectives and guide effective policies, rather than being limited to recording isolated incidents without their causal context.
Source: abc.com.pyPublished on 2023-07-24
Related news
- Las hipotecas sobre viviendas se desploman en CLM en un año
- Cuatro escenarios posibles en las elecciones generales - Tercera Información
- España es objeto de ciberataques masivos de origen ruso durante las elecciones del 23-J
- Uae Road Accidents: Most Dangerous Time And Day Of The Week When It Happens
- Ecuador refuerza seguridad en las cárceles tras nuevo enfrentamiento | El Deber