The article concludes that the administration of Andrés Manuel López Obrador has returned to opacity, failing to meet the transparency and open data standards promised during his campaign. Despite constitutional protections for access to information, the government has restricted critical data on infrastructure projects under the guise of national security and has ceased systematically generating or publishing public information. This represents a significant setback in accountability and limits civil society’s ability to oversee the exercise of power. Evidence shows that most official databases remain outdated by more than two years, creating an information vacuum that forces citizens to repeatedly file formal requests for basic information. This dynamic not only increases the administrative burden on government agencies but also degrades the quality of public debate. The lack of up-to-date data prevents accurate diagnoses of the country’s situation, affecting both innovation and the state’s capacity to effectively manage public issues. The relevance of this report for open data lies in its illustration of the direct consequences of institutional neglect: the erosion of proactive transparency and the collapse of dispute resolution mechanisms. The paralysis of the National Institute for Transparency, with its incomplete quorum, has created a bottleneck that accumulates unresolved complaints, demonstrating that the lack of data is not merely a technical omission but a structural failure that weakens democratic foundations. This case serves as a warning about the need to maintain robust and up-to-date mechanisms to ensure the availability and quality of public information.
Source: elpais.comPublished on 2023-08-11