La Justicia de EEUU dictaminó que el arte creado por IA no tiene derechos de autor
A U.S. federal judge has confirmed that works generated by artificial intelligence are not eligible for copyright protection, reaffirming that human authorship is a fundamental requirement. This ruling rejects the claims of those seeking to extend copyright protection to creations made without human mental intervention, establishing a clear precedent at the intersection of emerging technology and intellectual property. The court emphasizes that, unlike mechanical tools such as cameras—where a human operator directs the creative conception—AI lacks the intent and control necessary to be considered an author. This distinction is crucial for preserving the legal core of copyright law, which has historically protected expressions of the human mind, excluding both animals and autonomous systems that operate without direct human guidance. For the open data community, this decision is significant because it clarifies the legal status of algorithmically generated content. By denying exclusive ownership over such works, it strengthens the argument that purely automated data or creations should not be restricted by traditional copyright protections. This fosters an environment in which AI-generated content can be treated as a more accessible public good, provided there is no significant human creative contribution that would justify exclusive protection.
Source: infobae.comPublished on 2023-08-20