Why the right to privacy is incompatible with the right to information

The article argues that elevating informational privacy to a fundamental right fundamentally undermines the Right to Information Act, enabling the government to withhold personal data in official records under the guise of privacy protection. This legal shift prioritizes individual secrecy over public accountability, effectively allowing bureaucratic opacity and shielding corruption behind a veil of data protection laws. The author contends that this trend severely restricts citizens’ ability to scrutinize state actions, as transparency mechanisms now require complex consent processes that corrupt officials can easily manipulate or obstruct. The core conflict lies in the incompatibility between informed consent requirements and social audit practices, which rely on the public disclosure of citizen details to identify fraud and ensure equitable resource distribution. By treating addresses and names as private information protected by fundamental rights, the state gains gatekeeping power that can be abused to maintain fictitious records and evade scrutiny. The author asserts that privacy activists’ claims that individual privacy and state transparency are compatible ignore the practical reality that holding power accountable often necessitates revealing the personal details of both beneficiaries and officials. Relevance to open data is profound, as this legal framework threatens to restrict the flow of public sector information essential for civic engagement and anti-corruption efforts. The piece serves as a critical warning against allowing data protection norms to supersede openness, suggesting that without robust access to information, marginalized communities cannot effectively challenge systemic inequality. It highlights the urgent need to balance privacy concerns with the imperative of democratic transparency, ensuring that open data remains a viable tool for social justice rather than a mechanism for concealing state misconduct.

Source: scroll.in
Published on 2023-08-26