Juez federal emitió este polémico dictamen sobre las obras de arte creadas con IA
A U.S. court has set a crucial precedent by refusing copyright protection for works generated by artificial intelligence, reaffirming that human authorship is an indispensable requirement. The judge determined that, without the direct intervention of a “human hand” guiding the creative process, algorithmic creations do not deserve intellectual property status, regardless of the technological complexity used in their development. This ruling resolves a legal dispute initiated by Stephen Thaler, who sought to protect an image created by his algorithm, but its impact extends beyond the individual case by defining the boundaries of creativity in the digital age. The decision underscores the need to distinguish between the use of AI as an auxiliary tool, where the human remains the author, and autonomous generation, where the lack of human supervision precludes legal protection. The relevance to open data is fundamental, as many AI systems rely on training with large volumes of information, often derived from copyrighted works. This ruling directly affects practices related to data access and reuse, compelling open-source and free-knowledge communities to reassess how data provenance is handled and the risks of infringing copyright when developing models that learn from prior content without verifiable human authorship.
Source: laopinion.comPublished on 2023-08-27
Related news
- Optimización de almacenamiento en la nube: Consejos y Trucos
- Gobierno abierto: cómo mejorar la transparencia y participación en la gestión pública
- Inheritance tax penalties increase by more than a third to £2.3m
- The pedestrian detection systems in self-driving cars are less likely to detect children and people of color, study suggests