-

The article argues against replacing Panama’s existing Transparency Law with Project 1031, advocating instead for its revision to preserve its progressive core while correcting significant regressions. It criticizes the project for lacking genuine citizen consultation and for introducing structural weaknesses, such as reduced penalties for non-compliance and the elimination of key judicial mechanisms like habeas data. The author emphasizes that debating such critical legislation during an electoral period is dangerous and suggests that a thorough, consensual update should occur afterward. Furthermore, the piece highlights the necessity of guaranteeing the true administrative and budgetary independence of the Anti-Corruption Attorney General’s Office (Antai). It warns that the proposed changes risk subordinating the agency to political cycles and creating a problematic supra-authority structure. The exclusion of the Ombudsman and the omission of transparency regarding government beneficiaries, such as scholarships, are cited as major flaws that undermine the law’s effectiveness and intent. This discussion is crucial for open data because it touches on the fundamental right of citizens to access information for informed decision-making. As emphasized by international standards, universal access to information is a cornerstone of healthy, inclusive knowledge societies and democratic accountability. Protecting open data frameworks ensures that governments remain answerable, reinforcing the link between transparency, freedom of expression, and a robust civil society capable of exercising its rights effectively.

Source:
Published on 2023-08-30

Open Data

Related news