Video: "We Have Entered a Covenant With Death": Shocking FOIA Results: $11 Million to Bribe OB-GYNs to Lie to Moms About Safety of MRNA-Vaccines

The article presents unverified claims alleging that the U.S. government and pharmaceutical companies colluded to suppress post-marketing safety data for mRNA vaccines. It asserts that significant funding was directed to medical organizations and influencers to promote vaccine acceptance, particularly among pregnant women, while allegedly concealing evidence of harm. The text frames these actions as a coordinated effort to prioritize administration rates over transparent risk assessment, suggesting a systemic failure in regulatory oversight. This narrative is relevant to open data because it highlights the tension between public transparency and institutional secrecy. The author references Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to expose what they perceive as redacted or hidden government spending and communications. This underscores a critical issue in open data advocacy: the public’s need for accessible, unredacted government records to hold agencies accountable, especially when official data sources are contested or perceived as manipulated. Ultimately, the piece argues that the lack of immediate, fully transparent data access enabled a cover-up that compromised public trust. It implies that open data initiatives are essential for uncovering potential malfeasance in public health policy. By focusing on the alleged suppression of information rather than the raw data itself, the article emphasizes that true openness requires not just data publication, but the willingness to release contextually complete records without excessive redaction or bureaucratic obstruction.

Source: freerepublic.com
Published on 2023-08-30

Open Data

Related news