The National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information and Personal Data Protection (INAI) ordered the Mexican Social Security Institute for State Workers (ISSSTE) to publish detailed statistics on occupational risks, occupational diseases, and disability. This decision underscores that access to public data is essential for designing effective social policies. With this information, institutions can make evidence-based decisions to improve working conditions and strengthen social security. The ruling is significant for the open data movement because it requires that information be disaggregated and accessible, rather than merely aggregated in limited formats. ISSSTE attempted to comply with the law by providing links to general tables, but the tribunal determined that this was insufficient. A thorough search of both physical and electronic archives was required to deliver specific data by state and year, ensuring comprehensiveness and transparency. This case sets an important precedent regarding the quality and format of the information that institutions must provide. By mandating data disaggregation, it promotes accountability and enables civil society to analyze real trends. This reinforces the principle that transparency is not merely about publishing information, but about making it usable for research, public scrutiny, and the continuous improvement of public services.
Source: vanguardia.com.mxPublished on 2023-09-03