The president characterizes the INAI as a deceptive facade created to distract from systemic corruption rather than address it. He argues that these institutions simulate transparency while historically enabling theft through weakened legal frameworks, revealing a deep political conflict over accountability. This narrative highlights the tension between state power and independent oversight bodies. By framing transparency agencies as tools of diversion, the administration challenges their legitimacy and core function in maintaining public trust. Relevant to open data, this stance threatens the independence of information access mechanisms. It underscores how political resistance to transparency institutions can undermine the very data infrastructure required for anti-corruption efforts and democratic accountability.
Source:Published on 2023-11-14