The article argues that while governments aim to prevent fraud by mandating biometric collection for local services, this practice dangerously fragments data security. Expanding collection points creates multiple vulnerable targets, increasing the risk of large-scale breaches that compromise the entire national identity ecosystem rather than just isolated local databases. Centralizing biometric storage with the unique authority is essential to minimize exposure. Since no system is entirely secure against determined hackers, concentrating data reduces potential attack surfaces. Local entities should authenticate identities in real time through secure APIs rather than storing sensitive biometric traits themselves, thereby leveraging national infrastructure without assuming unnecessary security liabilities. This perspective is vital for open data advocates, as it highlights the tension between accessibility and privacy. It emphasizes that efficient open data infrastructure must prioritize robust, centralized security architectures to protect citizens’ fundamental rights. By restricting data collection, policymakers can balance legitimate verification needs with the imperative to safeguard personal information from systemic vulnerabilities.
Source: timesofindia.indiatimes.comPublished on 2023-11-18
Related news
- Cómo proteger tus datos personales durante el Buen Fin
- LexisNexis contract with US Customs and Border Protection is 'mass...
- ‘Mass Surveillance in Hyperdrive’: US Company Suspected of Enabling Government Abuses - Report
- Summing columns in remote Parquet files using DuckDB
- Call for tenders for Central Data Repository Solution being drafted - The Malta Independent