The article argues that public health authorities, specifically the CDC, manipulated the population into receiving unnecessary vaccines by dismissing the validity of natural immunity acquired from prior COVID-19 infection. It contends that despite millions of people having recovered, a coordinated narrative labeled natural immunity as a myth to maximize vaccine compliance, treating the vaccination campaign as an unscientific experiment rather than a necessary medical intervention. Central to this claim is the assertion that the CDC’s recommendations relied on a pharmaceutical-sponsored study lacking verifiable raw data. The text highlights that the agency published these conclusions without having access to the underlying evidence, which was held by an external contractor. This failure to scrutinize data from companies with a financial stake in vaccine sales is portrayed as a negligent and deliberate act to push a specific agenda, ignoring established epidemiological precedents regarding natural immunity. This article is highly relevant to open data because it illustrates the critical dangers of opaque decision-making in public health. It underscores the necessity for transparent, accessible, and auditable scientific data, showing how the lack of open data allows authorities to enforce policies based on unverified claims. The case serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of data sovereignty and public access to raw research to prevent manipulation and ensure accountability in crisis management.
Source: naturalnews.comPublished on 2023-12-05
Related news
- Democracy group urges overhaul of Nova Scotia's right to information law | CBC News
- Burnt out, bullied and threatened: Why our health workers are in crisis
- ChatGPT can leak training data, violate privacy, says Google's DeepMind
- New World Model based on "Limits to Growth" model : Peak oil studies, reports & models - Page 3
- El IPC de Turquía sube al 62% en noviembre