INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL: tajante límite de la Justicia del Reinoo Unido
The UK Supreme Court has definitively ruled that artificial intelligence cannot be considered an inventor under current legislation. This decision establishes that intellectual property rights can only be granted to human beings or legal entities, rejecting Stephen Thaler’s attempts to patent creations autonomously generated by his DABUS system. The ruling underscores the current incompatibility between traditional patent laws and the technical capacity of machines to innovate without direct human intervention. While the Intellectual Property Office welcomes the legal clarity provided by the decision, it acknowledges that the existing legal framework is inadequate for protecting emerging inventions driven by algorithms, highlighting the urgent need to adapt regulations to avoid hindering industrial technological development. This case is pivotal for the open data movement, as it exposes the legal limitations of automation in generating structured knowledge. If autonomous systems cannot hold rights, the debate intensifies over whether their outputs should be openly accessible. The lack of intellectual property protection could incentivize the release of such data, fostering collaborative innovation and free access to AI-created resources rather than their privatization.
Source: tn.com.arPublished on 2023-12-23
Related news
- El 60% de la población ocupada cobraba hasta $ 180.000 al término del tercer trimestre
- Online submission of Hajj Forms Extended - Kashmir Reader
- Defense Department Sued Over Canceled ‘Sound of Freedom’ Screenings
- Kerala HC Directs 'Indian Kanoon' To Anonymise Identity Of A Rape Accused, Says Details Of Victim & Accused Can't Be Published Sans Court's Permission
- ‘Challenging’ recruitment in Viscount Department a factor in inquest delays