OpenAI afirma que demanda de The New York Times ‘no tiene fundamento’
The central debate revolves around the viability of technological development in relation to intellectual property protection. The company argues that training advanced artificial intelligence models without access to copyrighted content would be practically impossible. This stance holds that restricting training to older works or those in the public domain would prevent the creation of useful and competitive tools, asserting that access to protected information is a fundamental requirement for current innovation and technical progress. From a legal and ethical perspective, the company defends its practice as constituting legitimate and fair use of data, aligned with international legislation and academic consensus. Rather than imposing absolute restrictions, they offer voluntary opt-out mechanisms for publishers, prioritizing corporate citizenship and respect over litigation. This position seeks to balance the need for resources for training with creators' rights to control the use of their work, promoting a flexible regulatory framework that fosters technological advancement without ignoring the legitimate concerns of authors. The relevance to the field of open data lies in how access and reuse of public information are being redefined. The article illustrates the tension between the free flow of data necessary to feed algorithms and the legal barriers protecting intellectual property. This case sets a crucial precedent regarding the extent to which society permits the commercial exploitation of user-generated and media content, challenging traditional principles of openness and suggesting that the future of data may require new models of collaboration and compensation between technology and original creators.
Source: nacion.comPublished on 2024-01-11