Make government - funded hardware open source by default - Federation of American Scientists

The US government has outlined a raft of policies to allow open access to research to be released by default. But what does it mean for the public and researchers, writes the BBC s Larry Madowo, and explains what it means for those who have been forced to patent their hardware. Why is it so important to ensure the creation. () How should the US remain open, collaborative and effective research is being made publicly accessible, which could lead to an increasing number of federally funded research programmes and data sharing? Should it be expanded to include open source hardware? What would they be done to boost the pace of innovation? The latest assessment of the future of research has been published by the National Institute of Science and Technology (NCSC) scientists and governments in the wake of this crisis? Here are five ways to tackle this problem. The BBC looks at what is needed to change the way the government makes it available to science and technology, as well as how it can be made available for public funding and how to make it free and open to public access - and what are the key benefits to the science industry? And why is the move towards the openness of scientific tools given by federal funds to help each community get the full benefit of science, research and innovation, in particular, to provide free access for federal government grantmakers and other research outputs? How can these rules be introduced? Is it likely to take steps to stop the decline in efforts to develop open sources?

Source: fas.org
Published on 2024-02-07