Exigen transparencia, pero bloquean mayor control a entes públicos
The article highlights a fundamental contradiction in Paraguay’s political management: while the ruling party promotes laws that demand greater transparency from nonprofit organizations, it has systematically obstructed initiatives that would improve accountability within the state itself. This double standard is evident in the vetoing of key bills, such as the law that would have allowed the Comptroller General to audit itself, the dilution of regulations on conflicts of interest, and the rejection of reforms that would have facilitated citizens’ access to public information. These decisions not only weaken internal control mechanisms but also reflect an interest in protecting power structures from external scrutiny. In addition to vetoing laws on government transparency and anti-revolving-door measures, the government has rejected tax increases intended for public health, suggesting a prioritization of particular or partisan interests over the common good and the state’s obligation to be transparent in its use of resources. For the open data movement, this situation is critical because it demonstrates that transparency is not merely a technical tool, but a political right subject to ideological struggle. The significance lies in how institutional opacity and the restriction of civic space through excessive bureaucracy directly affect the availability and usefulness of public data. Without a genuine commitment to opening government information, efforts to promote data access are undermined by a political environment that seeks to centralize control and limit social participation.
Source: ultimahora.comPublished on 2024-07-30