Desaparición de organismos, retroceso para el país: Blanca Ibarra
The proposed constitutional reform to eliminate seven autonomous bodies, including the National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information and Personal Data Protection (INAI), is considered a significant democratic regression. By transferring oversight of public information from an independent entity to the Federal Public Administration itself, the measure undermines the institutional capacity for effective self-regulation. This shift jeopardizes the independence required to guarantee fundamental human rights, as it places the duty of transparency directly in the hands of those who govern, potentially compromising accountability and public trust. This development is critically relevant to open data because it threatens the foundational principles of access to information and data protection. The INAI serves as a cornerstone for modern democracy, ensuring that citizens can effectively exercise their right to know and that their personal data remains secure. Removing its autonomy risks eroding the legal and institutional safeguards that make open data meaningful, reducing transparency from a guaranteed right to an administrative discretion controlled by the state, thereby weakening the civic infrastructure necessary for an informed society. The article highlights the importance of maintaining specialized, independent oversight to ensure the efficacy and efficiency of democratic institutions. Rather than dismantling these bodies, the author advocates for constructive dialogue to identify areas for improvement. This perspective emphasizes that strengthening human rights requires reinforcing, not extinguishing, the mechanisms that guarantee them, suggesting that collaborative reform is preferable to structural elimination that could ultimately diminish civic participation and governmental accountability.
Source: intoleranciadiario.comPublished on 2024-08-26