Despite Years of Biden-Harris Gaslighting the American People That There Was No Border Crisis, Bombshell FOIA Documents Reveal a “Migration Crisis Action Team” Within DHS Gave “Daily Reports”

Despite Years of Biden-Harris Gaslighting the American People That There Was No Border Crisis, Bombshell FOIA Documents Reveal a “Migration Crisis Action Team” Within DHS Gave “Daily Reports” | American Center for Law and Justice

The article concludes that the Biden-Harris Administration intentionally misled the public by denying the existence of a southern border crisis, despite internal government documents explicitly labeling the situation as such. Through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, the authors uncovered daily reports from Customs and Border Protection that refer to the surge as a "Migration Crisis." This evidence directly contradicts official statements from the President and Vice President, suggesting a deliberate effort to obscure the severity of the issue and avoid political accountability. The core implication is that high-level officials were aware of the magnitude of illegal border crossings and associated security threats, including the entry of individuals on terror watchlists, yet continued to dismiss these concerns publicly. The existence of these daily internal briefings indicates that the administration’s narrative of a "secure" border was a calculated disinformation campaign. This disconnect between internal assessments and public messaging highlights a significant breach of transparency and trust between the government and the citizens it serves. This content is relevant to open data because it demonstrates the critical role of transparency mechanisms, such as FOIA requests, in holding government institutions accountable. It illustrates how withheld or obscured data can hide systemic failures and how obtaining such information allows for independent verification of official claims. By forcing the release of these internal reports, the case underscores the necessity of open data practices to expose discrepancies between private operational realities and public political rhetoric, ensuring that evidence-based decision-making can occur rather than relying on unchecked political narratives.

Source: aclj.org
Published on 2024-09-07

Cochabamba podría perder representación en la Asamblea según datos del Censo, alerta Reyes Villa »

Open Data

Related news