After 25 years as a founder of Mumsnet, the author was shocked to learn that Google intended to overhaul UK copyright law to allow it to freely mine other publishers content for commercial gain without compensation. Mumsnet, which has experienced this practice firsthand, launched the first British legal action against tech giant OpenAI for scraping their content to train its large language model (LLM). The author argues that this practice is not only unfair to publishers but also poses an existential threat to them. The author points out that while Google has been crawling websites for search purposes, there is a value exchange in allowing Google to access data, such as search traffic. However, AI companies are building models with illegally scraped content, potentially replacing the very websites they are poised to replace. The author believes that allowing AI companies to steal content is not only unfair but also counterproductive, as it could lead to the demise of smaller publishers and the loss of unique content. Despite the potential benefits of AI, the author emphasizes the need for a fair value exchange between AI companies and content producers. The author highlights that Mumsnet has a unique position due to its direct traffic, which could help counter AI s gender bias. However, the author warns that Google s proposal to change copyright laws could lead to the loss of unique content and increased control of a few tech giants over the world s content and commerce. The author calls for the publishing industry and government to take action to ensure a fair and sustainable reward for content producers. They cite the recent Google antitrust trial in the US as evidence that big tech companies will exploit the law to grow their dominance. The author concludes that there is enough money in AI companies for everyone to be fairly compensated, but it requires action from the industry and government to prevent the loss of unique content and the concentration of power in a few tech giants.
Source: theguardian.comPublished on 2024-09-28
Related news
- A Dumpling vs Wall St : Why we need synthetics .
- A Dumpling vs Wall St : Why we need synthetics .
- New data - sharing requirements from the National Institutes of Health are a big step toward more open science – and potentially higher - quality research
- A Dumpling vs Wall St : Why we need synthetics .
- Top 10 Data & AI Trends for 2024
- From Open Letters To Open Source : Transparency Underpins AI Safety
- Top 10 Data & AI Trends for 2024
- Coronavirus Update : December COVID - 19 vaccine deliveries cost Canada about $16 - million : StatsCan
- Space commerce takes off
- Open Source DALL - E Open Diffusion Now Available
- Sarangani intensifies surveillance against dengue
- How to make money while killing time
- A new coronavirus vaccine heading to India was developed by a small team in Texas . It expects nothing in return .
- Marin agency sea - level study highlights vulnerable areas
- New Pa . covid cases , deaths continue downward trend