Sheinbaum defiende la desaparición del INAI: ‘Habrá más transparencia y menos corrupción’ | Noticias de México | El Imparcial

The Mexican government’s decision to abolish autonomous bodies such as the National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information and Personal Data Protection (INAI) and centralize their functions within executive secretariats fundamentally alters the structure of public accountability. By dissolving these independent agencies, the administration aims to streamline operations and reduce costs; however, this move effectively transfers oversight powers directly from autonomous entities to the executive branch. This structural shift prioritizes administrative efficiency over institutional independence, raising significant concerns about the potential loss of essential checks and balances in governance. The integration of transparency and data protection duties into the Secretary of Anticorruption suggests that while access to information will remain, its enforcement lacks the previous layer of autonomy. Critics argue that this concentration of power risks compromising the impartiality required for genuine transparency and the protection of citizens’ rights. The removal of independent monitors may undermine public trust, as the same branch of government that oversees these services also implements them, creating a potential conflict of interest that diminishes objective verification. This situation is critical for open data, because true openness relies on independent oversight to ensure data integrity and accessibility without political interference. When transparency mechanisms are absorbed by the executive branch, the risk of selective disclosure or manipulation of information increases. For open data ecosystems, the erosion of autonomous bodies threatens the foundational principle of trust, potentially reducing the reliability and utility of public information for civil society and innovation.

Source: elimparcial.com
Published on 2024-11-23