La SGAE reclama compensaciones para los autores por el daño que la Inteligencia Artificial está haciendo

Antonio Onetti, president of the SGAE, asserts that works generated by Artificial Intelligence lack originality and, therefore, cannot be protected by copyright. His main conclusion is that AI acts as an intruder, feeding on the repertoires of creators, which causes direct economic harm to authors. For this reason, he urgently advocates for economic compensation for creators, arguing that AI tools must operate under collective licenses managed by representation entities, thereby ensuring that companies developing these models pay for the use of human creativity. The relevance to open data lies in the need to regulate transparency in the use of training data. By requiring licenses for the development of models, a framework is created in which access to cultural repertoires is neither free nor gratuitous, but subject to intellectual property rights. This contrasts with the traditional philosophy of open data, which promotes free access, and underscores the importance of clearly defining which data can be used to train algorithms and under what economic and ethical conditions, thus protecting the interests of content producers. Finally, the article highlights the regulatory urgency, noting that Spain could lead this regulation globally before 2026. The proposal includes the creation of international delegations to improve the collection and control of rights in key markets such as Asia and the Americas. This initiative seeks to balance the coexistence between technology and human creativity, ensuring that the integration of AI into culture is responsible and that authors are not displaced or deprived of their economic rights due to the massive use of their works in machine training.

Source: lavozdegalicia.es
Published on 2024-12-14