Gobierno “pretende ser juez y parte con esta falsa ley de Transparencia”: Gustavo Sánchez
Gobierno “pretende ser juez y parte con esta falsa ley de Transparencia”: Gustavo Sánchez
The article underscores the critical threat to democratic transparency in Mexico, signaled by the dissolution of the National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information, and Personal Data Protection (INAI). The government’s proposal to absorb INAI’s functions into the Anti-Corruption Secretariat raises serious concerns about the centralization of power. This shift effectively eliminates the essential independence required for an oversight body to hold the state accountable, creating a scenario in which the executive branch controls its own transparency mechanisms. This restructuring undermines the fundamental principle of checks and balances necessary for a healthy democracy. By transferring control to a government entity, the risk of data concealment and authoritarian practices increases significantly. Citizens lose a vital tool for accessing public information when it is withheld by obligated entities, as there is no longer an autonomous arbiter to resolve disputes. This erosion of independent oversight jeopardizes the protection of personal data and public accountability, moving the nation toward a regime in which the state acts as both judge and party. This situation is highly relevant to open data, because true openness relies on independent enforcement rather than voluntary compliance by government branches. Without an independent institute to guarantee access, the quality and availability of public information become subject to political interests. The loss of such autonomy threatens the integrity of the open data ecosystem, ensuring that transparency becomes a rhetorical concept rather than a guaranteed right for citizens seeking to understand and monitor government actions.
Source: zetatijuana.comPublished on 2025-03-01