¿De quién son los derechos de autor de una obra creada con IA? Esto dice la ley en Colombia

The article concludes that, under current Colombian law, works created solely by artificial intelligence cannot be protected by copyright, as authorship requires decisive human creative intervention. This position aligns with international precedents, emphasizing that machines cannot hold rights and that originality is defined by human contribution rather than mere novelty. Consequently, creators must demonstrate that their role was substantial to claim ownership, ensuring that AI serves merely as a tool rather than the primary author. This perspective is vital for the open data and AI community because it establishes a legal boundary between automated generation and human-centric intellectual property. It challenges the growing trend of treating AI outputs as free-to-use public domain assets, clarifying that while the machine generates the raw material, human curation and modification are what legally validate the work. This distinction impacts how datasets are licensed and how generated content is attributed in collaborative environments. For practitioners, the implication is that transparency and documentation are essential. Developers and users must retain evidence of their creative input and verify that training data respects existing intellectual property rights. As regulatory frameworks evolve globally, understanding these limits helps avoid legal disputes and ensures that the integration of AI into creative and data-driven processes remains ethically and legally sound, preserving the value of human creativity in an automated world.

Source: eltiempo.com
Published on 2025-03-30

¿De quién son los derechos de autor de una obra creada con IA? Esto dice la ley en Colombia

Related news