De las fotos estilo Ghibli a las portadas con IA: ¿qué pasa con los derechos de autor y la inteligencia artificial?

De las fotos estilo Ghibli a las portadas con IA: ¿qué pasa con los derechos de autor y la inteligencia artificial?

The generation of images using artificial intelligence that replicate specific artistic styles, such as that of Studio Ghibli, raises a complex ethical and legal debate that goes beyond mere technical copying. The core of the controversy lies in how models are trained, often using protected works without permission or compensation, which creates risks of cultural appropriation, algorithmic bias, and brand dilution. The legal implications are ambiguous due to the lack of harmonization in European copyright directives, leaving a gap that allows large commercial platforms to exploit artists' reputations improperly. Beyond the legal aspects, there is strong opposition to this practice due to its impact on the creative society. It is considered a form of cultural extractivism that trivializes art, transforming profound expressions into superficial products devoid of meaning. This mass automation not only trivializes human effort and artistic detail but also threatens the self-esteem and motivation of creators, fostering an extreme hybridization that blurs solid cultural references and promotes widespread aesthetic mediocrity. This article is relevant to open data because it highlights the urgent need for transparency in the training of artificial intelligence models. To ensure fairness and ethics, it is essential to understand the origin and legality of the data used, avoiding the non-consensual exploitation of protected knowledge. The discussion about intellectual property and access to the underlying information in these systems reflects the central principles of open culture: valuing the origin of data, protecting cultural diversity, and demanding accountability in technological development in the face of algorithmic opacity.

Source: lavozdegalicia.es
Published on 2025-05-28