SACM lanza llamado urgente por la IA; alerta por riesgos en los derechos de autor

SACM lanza llamado urgente por la IA; alerta por riesgos en los derechos de autor

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation is currently reviewing an amparo case concerning whether artificial intelligence can be recognized as an author with intellectual property rights. This legal debate centers on whether creations generated by AI systems can be registered under existing copyright laws, a matter that touches upon the fundamental definition of creativity and originality in Mexican law. The Society of Authors and Composers of Mexico urges a serious analysis, emphasizing that creativity and originality are exclusive to human beings. Consequently, they argue that artificial entities cannot hold moral or patrimonial rights. Accepting AI authorship would create a precedent where works could potentially be treated as public goods, allowing their free exploitation without compensation to human creators. This issue is critical for open data and digital rights because it challenges the balance between accessible technology and the protection of human intellectual property. If AI-generated content is deregulated, it risks undermining the economic and moral safeguards established for authors. The debate highlights the urgent need to define legal frameworks that protect human creativity while navigating the rapid advancement of generative technologies, ensuring that rights remain anchored in human dignity and constitutional guarantees.

Related news

• The Velvet Sundown: banda creada por IA sacude la industria musical y suma millones de oyentes
• AI malware can now evade Microsoft Defender — open-source LLM outsmarts tool around 8% of the time after three months of training
• News 5 Pushes for Transparency in Guzman Appointment - Greater Belize Media
• AWS believes humans and AI can be workplace allies
• Fed up with AI scraping your content? This open-source bot blocker can help - here's how