¿Tus creaciones hechas con IA tienen dueño legal o a quién le pertenecen?

Mexico’s Supreme Court denied copyright protection to an image generated by artificial intelligence, reaffirming that current legislation recognizes only natural persons as authors. This ruling highlights the difficulty of distinguishing between creative human intervention and algorithmic processing, raising a fundamental dilemma regarding ownership when AI acts as a tool rather than an autonomous creator. The key distinction lies in the degree of human originality and selection. While works generated entirely by machines are not eligible for protection, those created with active user participation—through selection and modification—may be registered. This necessitates the development of new documentation strategies to demonstrate human creative contribution, a challenge that directly affects intellectual property management in the digital age. This case is crucial for open data, as it sets precedents on how public data and algorithmic outputs are treated within the legal framework. By limiting authorship to human beings, it reinforces the need for transparency in the datasets used to train models and clarifies rights over generated outputs. This directly impacts the ethics and reuse of open data, ensuring that technological innovation respects existing copyright laws and fosters an ecosystem where human–machine collaboration is clearly regulated.

Source: expansion.mx
Published on 2025-08-07

¿Tus creaciones hechas con IA tienen dueño legal o a quién le pertenecen?

Related news