¿Guanajuato aún puede garantizar la transparencia? Esto recomienda la expresidenta del INAI

The article stresses that Guanajuato must create a decentralized body, rather than entrusting transparency guarantees exclusively to the Secretary of Honesty, in order to preserve effective access to information. This distinction is crucial because placing oversight within the Secretary of Honesty effectively concentrates power under the Governor, creating a conflict of interest that risks politicizing the review process and eroding public trust. The main implication of this structural choice is the potential loss of citizen-centered justice. Drawing on her experience with the former national institute, the author warns that when control remains too close to the executive branch, rulings tend to favor government agencies over citizens. This shift could significantly undermine the effectiveness of grievance mechanisms, mirroring the decline in pro-citizen resolutions observed in recent federal reforms. This issue is highly relevant to open data, as robust access to information forms the foundation of data-driven governance. Without an independent and technically qualified body to enforce transparency, the flow of critical public data may be obstructed by political interests. Ensuring a neutral guarantee mechanism protects the integrity of public data ecosystems and prevents the deterioration of accountability structures essential for a functioning open society.

Source: am.com.mx
Published on 2025-08-30

¿Guanajuato aún puede garantizar la transparencia? Esto recomienda la expresidenta del INAI

Related news