“Las obras creadas por IA no pueden registrarse como derechos de autor”: INDAUTOR

The Supreme Court of Mexico has firmly established that works generated exclusively by artificial intelligence cannot be registered as copyright-protected creations. This landmark ruling reinforces the fundamental principle that copyright is an exclusive human right, rooted in individual creativity, intellect, and personality. By denying registration to AI-generated content, the court confirms that true originality requires human authorship, thereby excluding autonomous digital entities from holding legal ownership over their outputs. The decision explicitly rejects arguments that excluding AI constitutes discrimination or violates international treaties such as the Bern Convention or T-MEC. The court clarified that these frameworks do not recognize artificial intelligence as an author, and the limitation of authorship to natural persons is both objective and constitutionally sound. This clarification ensures that intellectual property laws remain aligned with human rights standards, distinguishing between natural creators and artificial systems based on incompatible legal characteristics. This ruling is highly relevant to open data discussions because it defines the legal status of machine-generated content within Mexico’s intellectual property framework. It sets a critical precedent for how open data initiatives must handle AI-derived information, ensuring that open licensing models do not inadvertently grant copyright protection where none legally exists. Understanding this boundary is essential for developers and organizations using AI in data creation, as it dictates that such outputs remain in the public domain with respect to copyright, influencing how data can be shared, reused, and integrated into open ecosystems without fear of infringement claims based on authorship.

Source: zetatijuana.com
Published on 2025-08-30

“Las obras creadas por IA no pueden registrarse como derechos de autor”: INDAUTOR

Related news