Defensores de DD. HH. alegan presuntas violaciones a la protección de datos personales, seguridad jurídica y falta de regulación en audiencia contra Ley de Inteligencia

Representatives of human rights organizations have called for the unconstitutionality of the Organic Intelligence Law, arguing that it violates fundamental rights such as data protection, privacy, and legal certainty. The legislation grants the Executive branch excessive powers to access confidential information without adequate judicial oversight, creating a control vacuum that enables the selective targeting of dissident groups. This expansion of intelligence powers eliminates the necessary safeguards for privacy and due process, blurring the boundaries between the branches of government. By allowing technological surveillance and interception of communications without prior judicial authorization, the law not only contradicts the Constitution but also undermines international human rights standards, setting a dangerous precedent for individual liberty. This case is relevant to open data because it illustrates the critical tension between state transparency and the protection of personal data. By centralizing access to information and eliminating judicial declassification mechanisms, the law hinders accountability and the right to know, demonstrating how institutional opacity can be institutionalized under the pretext of security, directly affecting the ability to audit the use of public data.

Source: eluniverso.com
Published on 2025-09-02

Defensores de DD. HH. alegan presuntas violaciones a la protección de datos personales, seguridad jurídica y falta de regulación en audiencia contra Ley de Inteligencia

Related news