Luis Quevedo: “La IA no te va a quitar el trabajo, te lo va a quitar quien sepa usarla”

The recent settlement between Anthropic and authors establishes a critical global precedent, confirming that training AI on copyrighted works without explicit permission requires compensation. This case highlights a fundamental shift: while training itself may not be illegal, the lack of notification and authorization for creators constitutes a violation of rights. It underscores the necessity of acknowledging the human origin of creative data, ensuring authors are not exploited for algorithmic improvement without fair remuneration. Beyond legal implications, the article emphasizes that AI creativity is derivative, relying entirely on existing human artistic output. This dependency suggests that human authors remain indispensable, as AI cannot replicate the originality that precedes its training data. Consequently, rather than replacing humans, the technology forces an adaptation where the value of authentic human creativity is preserved and respected, preventing the devaluation of artistic labor. This development is vital for open data initiatives, as it draws a clear line between open information and restricted intellectual property. It urges policymakers to fill regulatory voids, ensuring that data openness does not erase creators' rights. By mandating transparency and compensation, the situation reinforces the ethical framework necessary for sustainable data ecosystems, balancing innovation with the protection of original authorship.

Source: perfil.com
Published on 2025-10-08

Luis Quevedo: “La IA no te va a quitar el trabajo, te lo va a quitar quien sepa usarla”

Related news