¿Se puede registrar una obra hecha con Inteligencia Artificial? Esto dice la Suprema Corte
¿Se puede registrar una obra hecha con Inteligencia Artificial? Esto dice la Suprema Corte
The Supreme Court of Mexico has definitively ruled that works autonomously generated by artificial intelligence cannot be registered under copyright laws. This landmark decision establishes that copyright is an exclusive human right derived from individual creativity, intellect, and personality. Consequently, AI systems are not recognized as authors, and works lacking human input do not meet the originality requirements mandated by federal law. The court emphasized that international treaties and constitutional principles do not extend human rights protections to artificial entities. While acknowledging the rapid growth of AI tools, the ruling reaffirms that limiting authorship to natural persons is reasonable and compatible with global standards. This prevents the dilution of copyright protections by excluding non-human creators, ensuring that legal frameworks remain grounded in human-centric values. This ruling is highly relevant to open data and open culture movements because it clarifies the legal status of machine-generated content. For open initiatives, this means AI outputs currently lack the robust legal protection offered to human-made creative works. Understanding this boundary is crucial for developers and creators who integrate open data sources with AI; it highlights the need to distinguish between open tools and open outputs, ensuring that future collaborative models respect the established distinction between human authorship and automated generation.
Source: tvazteca.comPublished on 2025-11-09