IA y propiedad intelectual: el dilema de la autoría en plena era algorítmica

Current theories and legal precedents firmly establish that artificial intelligence lacks the subjective experience and self-awareness required for human-like authorship. Consequently, intellectual property laws continue to reserve creative rights exclusively for humans, rejecting AI claims to invention or copyright based on the absence of true consciousness. This distinction remains critical for open data because it defines the boundaries of AI training and output ownership. By affirming that algorithms process patterns rather than create with intent, the law supports a framework where data usage is governed by human-centric rights rather than attributing agency to machines. Understanding this separation helps users critically evaluate AI outputs, recognizing them as sophisticated computations rather than expressions of inner life. This clarity prevents the misleading attribution of creativity to systems, ensuring that open data initiatives respect existing legal and philosophical definitions of human authorship and intellectual contribution.

Source: revistaeyn.com
Published on 2025-11-26

IA y propiedad intelectual: el dilema de la autoría en plena era algorítmica

Related news