Múltiples organizaciones internacionales reclaman a la Gobernadora vetar enmiendas a la Ley de Transparencia

The legislative proposal in Puerto Rico, known as Senate Bill 63, has sparked strong opposition for attempting to weaken the right to access public information. National and international organizations warn that these changes constitute a democratic setback, pushing the island down the global transparency index and undermining investor confidence. The measure is seen as a direct threat to oversight and the fight against corruption, which are essential elements of responsible governance. Central arguments point out that the amendments excessively delay response times and allow information to be classified as confidential through internal regulations or rulings by lower courts. This would significantly hinder journalistic work and citizen participation, as the requirement to provide data in analytical formats would be eliminated. Restricting fast and affordable access to public documents violates the constitutional principle of the rule of law, leaving citizens and the media "in the dark" during critical moments of coordination with state and federal entities. This article is relevant to the open data movement because it illustrates how institutional opacity is legally codified, preventing the effective reuse of public information. By allowing agencies to hide data or obstruct its delivery, the fundamental pillars of transparency necessary for accountability are eroded. The resistance from citizen coalitions and human rights organizations highlights that access to data is not merely a bureaucratic formality, but a vital tool for strengthening democracy and preventing abuses of power.

Source: metro.pr
Published on 2025-12-12

Múltiples organizaciones internacionales reclaman a la Gobernadora vetar enmiendas a la Ley de Transparencia

Related news