El Gobierno reprocha el “exceso” del Supremo con la ‘ley de nietos’: “No existe ningún riesgo derivado del crecimiento del censo”

The Government argues that the Supreme Court’s precautionary suspension of voting rights for naturalized citizens under the “Grandchildren Law” constitutes judicial overreach that infringes upon fundamental rights. The State Attorney’s Office maintains that the high court has prejudged the merits of the case by challenging the legality of a ministerial instruction that was never formally contested, thereby substantially altering the legal situation without an adequate procedural basis. This position seeks to safeguard the integrity of the administrative procedure, in which registration on the electoral roll is an automatic consequence of nationality, not an independent phase subject to isolated suspension. From the perspective of transparency and access to public information, this conflict highlights the tension between administrative transparency rules and judicial decisions that restrict access to political rights. By arguing that the electoral impact is statistically negligible, the Government underscores how legal interpretations can generate uncertainty in the management of census data and in determining who is entitled to participate in the democratic process. This directly affects the regulatory clarity required for an informed citizenry and the open functioning of institutions. The relevance of this article to open data lies in its exposition of the interdependence between the quality of administrative data, its accessibility, and democratic legitimacy. The case illustrates how opacity or a restrictive interpretation of the criteria for granting rights can be affected by judicial interventions that modify the dynamics of public records. Finally, it emphasizes the importance of maintaining accessible and comprehensible data processes to ensure that electoral rolls accurately reflect the legal reality, thereby safeguarding confidence in the integrity of the electoral system and protecting citizens’ rights against arbitrary decisions.

Source: elpais.com
Published on 2026-09-22