¿Bajó el desempleo o se pulverizaron los buenos empleos?

The article concludes that the apparent improvement in the unemployment rate masks a severe deterioration in labor conditions, where the decline in unemployment is driven by workers losing formal jobs and accepting wages below the legal minimum. Rather than a productive recovery, there is a massive destruction of quality jobs and a dramatic increase in invisible underemployment, revealing a structural crisis rather than an economic recovery. The relevance for open data lies in the need to avoid relying solely on aggregate indicators such as the overall unemployment rate, and instead emphasizes the critical importance of publishing and analyzing disaggregated data by employment category. True transparency requires making visible the balance between full employment and underemployment, as well as wage levels, so that citizens and analysts can determine whether statistical improvements reflect genuine well-being or a degradation of the labor market. Furthermore, the text highlights that the lack of access to this detailed information facilitates biased official narratives that overestimate consumption capacity and tax revenue. By not making details about job quality and income accessible, an honest assessment of public policies and their real economic impact on the working class is hindered, demonstrating that the quality and granularity of open data are essential for accountability and informed decision-making.

Source: prensa.com
Published on 2026-10-02

¿Bajó el desempleo o se pulverizaron los buenos empleos?

Related news