Social media for the kids

The proposed ban on social media for users under 16 in Pakistan is criticized as a political tool to suppress dissent rather than a genuine protection measure. Given the country’s young demographic and constitutional guarantees of free speech, such restrictions contradict the democratic potential of digital platforms. The government’s history of selectively restricting internet access suggests these bans aim to silence critical voices rather than address safety concerns, undermining the very freedoms enshrined in law. Social media serves as a vital mechanism for civic engagement and accountability, empowering youth across socio-economic classes to drive social justice and political change. Evidence from Pakistan and other South Asian nations demonstrates that digital mobilization holds the state accountable and facilitates democratic expression, especially in low-income communities. These platforms provide an essential outlet for political participation, allowing marginalized groups to amplify their demands and influence policy in ways traditional media often cannot. Research indicates that social media does not pose unique harms to adolescents compared to other age groups, with older adults often facing more severe risks. Consequently, blanket bans hinder the development of political literacy among future voters and restrict access to vital information. For open data and democratic transparency, preserving unrestricted access to digital discourse is crucial; it ensures that citizens can monitor government actions effectively. Restricting access not only stifles innovation but also obscures the public’s ability to demand accountability in an increasingly digital society.

Source: geo.tv
Published on 2026-10-09

Social media for the kids

Related news