Internet Archive's digital book lending violates copyright, US judge rules
Internet Archive's digital book lending violates copyright, US judge rules
A U.S. court ruled that the Internet Archive infringed copyright by scanning and digitally lending books from major publishers without authorization. This decision rejects the organization’s claim that its "controlled digital lending" model constitutes fair use, establishing that while physical books can be lent, bulk digitization for digital distribution requires publisher permission. The ruling highlights a critical tension between preserving cultural heritage through digital access and protecting intellectual property rights. By denying the fair use defense, the judgment clarifies that digital lending cannot simply replace traditional library licensing models, thereby limiting the scope of nonprofit institutions in expanding free access to copyrighted works online. This case is highly relevant to open data and open access advocates because it sets a precedent for digital resource distribution. It demonstrates the legal risks associated with digitizing and freely sharing copyrighted materials, impacting how open initiatives navigate copyright constraints while striving to make information accessible.
Source: digbycourier.caPublished on 2026-10-10
Related news
- USA Today vs OpenAI: Key questions over ChatGPT training data, news copyright and whether publishers should be paid for their work
- The Journalists’ Revolt Against AI Scraping | Countercurrents
- Marion County Record: Police chief resigns after investigation by local Kansas newspaper
- BREAKING: U.S. Court Filing Alleges Tinubu Govt Pays DCI-Linked US Lobbying Firm $750,000 Monthly
- Project to build big-data legal database approved