In strange decision, RTI officer says RGNUL need not supply annual reports electronically because too difficult
RGNUL Patiala was criticized for refusing to digitize annual reports, citing resource constraints despite other national law universities successfully publishing theirs online. The institution argued that maintaining electronic records was not mandatory due to financial limitations, a stance later adjusted to charge applicants for mailing physical copies. This dispute highlights a significant gap in open_data practices within legal academia. While peer institutions demonstrate that digital transparency is feasible and compliant with right to information standards, RGNUL’s reliance on physical records creates unnecessary barriers for public access to financial accountability. The case underscores the importance of proactive digital publication in the open_data movement. It reveals that administrative convenience or alleged resource issues should not impede the availability of public records, emphasizing that true transparency requires removing logistical obstacles for citizens seeking institutional information.
Source: legallyindia.comPublished on 2026-10-14
Related news
- DVAC Not Exempt From Sharing Information Relating To Corruption And Human Rights Violations Under RTI Act: Madras High Court
- US Supreme Court agrees to hear watchdog case on Elon Musk’s DOGE records
- Supreme Court to hear case testing powers of Elon Musk DOGE investigation
- PETA public records lawsuits seek identities of UMass animal research panel members - Amherst Bulletin
- ABC, NBC Ignore Grim Housing Report; Focus Instead on Selfie with Queen, 50 Shades of Grey Trailer