Membership of CLAT 2015 ‘expert panel’ is top-secret, immune to RTI, claims RMLNLU

The article highlights a significant conflict between institutional transparency and administrative secrecy in standardized testing. By rejecting a Right to Information request to identify the secret members of the expert panel, the organizing body demonstrated a lack of accountability in managing alleged errors in the CLAT 2015 papers. This opacity undermines public trust, as stakeholders are denied the ability to verify the expertise and impartiality of those judging their evaluations. The handling of two separate expert panels further illustrates procedural irregularities. The second panel’s findings, which dismissed numerous alleged errors, were kept hidden and only revealed through a sealed court submission that even a judge found questionable. The failure to publicly notify these results or adhere to court timelines suggests a deliberate effort to close the admission process without addressing legitimate grievances, prioritizing administrative convenience over fairness and open data practices. This incident is highly relevant to the open data movement because it exemplifies how critical public interest data is often withheld or obscured. It underscores the necessity of proactive disclosure and accessible records in educational assessments. Without transparent data regarding evaluation criteria, panel compositions, and error reports, citizens cannot effectively hold institutions accountable, reinforcing the need for stronger legal frameworks that mandate openness in public sector operations.

Source: legallyindia.com
Published on 2026-11-04

Membership of CLAT 2015 ‘expert panel’ is top-secret, immune to RTI, claims RMLNLU

Related news