Turning Raw Data into Public Good: 3 Real-World Examples

Raw records become real rights when we use open data to build a better world. We often see data as cold numbers hidden in government servers or big company files. But this information is the blueprint of our society. It is the raw material for public life. We use open data to promote fairness, honesty, and accountability. Three new examples show how digital information helps justice, efficiency, and community growth.

Senzing.ai combines over 80 million business records into one clear graph in the United States. This project uses open-source principles to match different records. It turns messy, unstructured data into a clean, usable dataset. This process breaks down private silos that often hide corporate secrets and fraud. Closed systems make it hard to see who really controls a business. Open standards help financial services and other sectors check for fraud with high accuracy. This approach fits with legal rules about data use. The project follows privacy laws like GDPR and CCPA while still innovating. For more on how legal rules shape what we can do with this information, see our guide on [legal] What licence open data carries, and what you may do with it -> /guides/open-data-licences/.

Open data also helps ensure fair access to city services through public infrastructure. A new project fixes old bus stop rules to show this impact. Traditional real-time bus info needs personal smartphones. This creates a digital divide that leaves vulnerable people behind. This project moves away from private devices. Instead, it uses public digital displays powered by open data. The project requires everyone to have access to this information. This ensures that travel info is available to all, no matter what technology they use. This approach treats transit data as a public good, not a private product. It helps communities plan their days with confidence. If you want to know how to get real-time feeds for your own projects, our guide on [access] How to use an open-data portal’s API: CKAN, DCAT and OpenDataSoft -> /guides/open-data-portal-api/ explains the technical steps to get this information.

Local innovations in Argentina improve city governance and business climates through shared knowledge. This shows how open data helps share best practices. Cities adapt these practices to their local needs and share them on open data platforms. This collaboration builds trust and cooperation between local governments. Shared knowledge helps cities use proven strategies. This strengthens the business environment and supports sustainable development. Open data speeds up city improvements by making success visible and easy to copy. Transparency acts as the spark for economic growth and social stability. To understand how to read the metrics that drive these decisions, such as employment rates or business growth stats, we recommend reading our guide on [analysis] How to read a statistic before you quote it -> /guides/read-a-statistic/.

These stories share a common thread: open data connects raw information to public good. Data must be accessible, usable, and transparent to create value. We build a fairer, more efficient, and more accountable world by supporting open-source principles and public infrastructure.

For users in the consideration or awareness stage, open data has distinct pros and cons. The main upside is increased transparency and accountability. Open data lets citizens check corporate hierarchies and spot fraud, as seen in the Senzing.ai project. This visibility empowers communities to hold power accountable. It helps them make informed decisions about public services. Fair access to information, like real-time bus data, reduces the digital divide. It supports vulnerable populations. This inclusivity fosters social stability and economic growth, as seen in Argentine city innovations.

However, open data also has downsides regarding privacy and security. Combining millions of records into entity graphs raises concerns about data misuse. There is also a risk of re-identification. Even with laws like GDPR and CCPA, combining different data sources can expose sensitive personal info. Users must navigate complex legal rules to stay compliant. Also, relying on open standards requires technical skills to access and interpret data well. This barrier can exclude people without digital literacy or resources. This might widen the gap between tech-savvy users and the general public. Users must weigh the benefits of transparency against the risks to privacy and the effort needed to use these tools.

• How to file a FOIA request — and what to do when it is denied